Showing posts with label Wheat and grain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wheat and grain. Show all posts

03 May 2020

Three gems emerge

Things keep falling out of the family photograph collection as various family members self isolate.  I hadn't seen these three photographs until last Friday.  

First up, 3028T shunts a BSV bogie sheep van in Dubbo yard in the early part of 1968 when its locally-applied royal blue livery was still relatively unfaded. 


Probably snapped on the same visit to this region, just up the Newell Highway at Eumungerie the locals were celebrating the opening of their new wheat bulkhead. It wasn't just a great asset for the local farmers - when empty it was also a terrific indoor cricket venue.  It is difficult to imagine these days, but these facilities were routinely left unlocked which was just inviting inspection and nefarious use.


And this third photo is of 3289, crossing the Fitzroy Street level crossing in Dubbo, around 1970.  Although the loco's cab numbers are obscured, its at-the-time unique NSWGR sand box embellishment confirms its identity. 


If these sorts of photographs keep coming to light, I really have no problem with being isolated for another three months or so.

Cheers,
Don

14 March 2020

Fiddling, instead of working

I have just been playing with some basic, free photo enhancement software.  I am not always sure that using these products is for the best, especially in the hands of someone like myself.  I am relatively comfortable with the idea that photos, just like memories and all of us, just fade away.   That said, having seen some stellar enhancement efforts in recent times, I resolved to have a go at 'improving' some of the family's photo collection.

Around 1977-78 His Nibs invested in one of those cameras which spat out the result as soon as you pressed the shutter.  It was a great way to have your still-developing photos make an early entrance into the dusty atmosphere and even the dirt of whatever railway yard you were standing in.  

You don't need to see the 'before' shot, but here is the 'after'.  I could never work out what we were trying to photograph in this shot - the gantry crane or the station building.  The original was taken about 80 yards from the former, which really helps with the composition.


Even in the 1970s I can guarantee you that the sky was never that colour.  Still, it is an improvement on the original.

Next are a couple of shots of 4911 in May 1979 on a down wheatie.  I have cropped the photo and lightened the side of the loco/train.  Am now happier with the shot of the train, though it looks like the silo is about to ascend to heaven with Charlton Heston.



And now, back to work!

Cheers
Don

05 February 2019

Lost from the 50s

Just when you think that the family photograph collection has been 100% plundered for near-publishable photos of Eumungerie up pop a few more - this time from another uncle who is pleased to share his bounty.

Last Sunday four more photos arrived in electronic form from said uncle. This first one is a version of one I have already posted, showing a slightly blurred 30T, suspected to be 3004T, taking water at Eumungerie. 

I also suspected that 3004T (tbc) was on No. 5 down pickup, which was supposed to depart Eumungerie around 7:00am every day except Sundays.  My problem with that theory is that the loco should be horribly back-lit. Maybe it was a cloudy day? Maybe.  Anyway, here is the shot.

Now  the exciting stuff.  There is a companion photograph!  And its less blurred!


In this second photo the fireman can be seen more clearly on the back of the tender, as can the decent coal load.  The driver is down at the base of the water column - though it could be one of my bloody relatives making a nuisance of themselves.  Again, the shadows are worrying me.  Also worrying me is the lack of cab numbers - no, I haven't been into Photoshop removing things.  The most excellent fillum used by our family just managed to ignore this detail.  Or less likely, the numbers have been removed by persons unknown (said relative is in the clear).

Now, this third photograph adds to the theory.  It shows a rather new two car diesel working through Eumungerie. Its pretty early on - early 1950s I am guessing - as there is no ETP/EHO on the rear.  And the collection of wagons on the adjacent line are a rich tapestry indeed.  A couple of Ks or like stuffed with hay for hungry beasts, a steel (?) S wagon loaded with fuel drums and a decrepit looking louvre van form part of the load. To this sad case, its gorgeous. And don't get me started on the lamp room, the telegraph pole and point levers.

If No. 45 Diesel Train is running on time, this photograph was taken at 8:48am, and its a Tuesday or a Thursday.  And if these wagons belong to 3004T, it might just explain why the shadows aren't where they should be at 7:00am.  Its because the pick-up is running late. 

And now for the final photograph...


First of all, the shadows are where I expect them to be around 9:00am!

Here we have the station officer (from the waist coat and hat) squeezing between the pick-up and a RU wheat wagon which is lined up for loading.  What's special - the lack of ash as ballast, the wagons forming the Pick-up, or the blob in front of the goods shed just to the right of the RU? You are correct if you answer 'all of the above'.

So, I have still not convinced myself that all four of these photos belong with each other (certainly the first two do), or that it shows a busy Tuesday or Thursday morning in Eumungerie in the 1950s. But it makes a good yarn and a decent modelling proposition.

But the best news is that said uncle thinks he has more!

Until then, cheers!
Don

22 May 2018

Candy abounds!

It has been several days since the Modelling the Railways of NSW 35th Convention, where I had the opportunity to co-present (read, evangelise) about the Coonamble branch.  If you were at the Convention and attended one of my sessions, thank you for not throwing anything at me, including hard questions. I frankly had a ball; listening to myself speak has always been one of my favourite past-times.  But now life will return to normal, which means blogging!

One of the drawbacks of presenting (perhaps the only drawback) is the reduced opportunity you have to attend other sessions.  I only got to one other session and it was on a subject which perplexes me to this day - signalling.  It was a beaut session and I can now confidently say that the signal in the photo below is a short one.


I think I promised to post a larger version of the photograph above showing the silo complex just too intimidating to climb or model.  And here is a going away shot of the same train...




Its late so I will wrap things here but before I do I will try to redress the dominance of Indian red locos on this blog - a fair comment by a patron last weekend.  Here's two photos, both from around 1985, of candy-liveried locos heading north through Eumungerie. First up, a pretty 4844 on a pretty standard empty wheatie.






I haven't shown enough photos of shy locos on this blog... so here's one of 4874 hiding behind a pole.

Cheers!
Don

17 January 2017

A short video about grain

Over the last couple of weeks I have been experimenting (without a real lot of success) in uploading videos to Blogger. Unless it is done through YouTube there are issues.  

This means double handling for someone like myself who has committed to uploading to Flickr as it allows you to post photos, videos and even document in the same place. Someone who knows the dark arts of Blogger is welcome to let me know about shortcuts!

Here is what I would describe as one of my successes... from 2007, 48102, 48125, 4894 and 48144 haul a down empty grain through Eumungerie. Nice Alco dribble.


I will be back soon, hopefully with a few more videos!

Cheers,
Don






26 April 2015

How to store wheat

It has been a while, however it is not lack of interest, just time.

As mentioned in earlier posts, I have been trawling Trove - the Australian National Library's excellent digitised newspaper (and other documents) service for stories about the Coonamble line. It was always a manageable task until Trove recently uploaded years of the Wellington Times, Narromine News and Trangie Advocate, and the Gilgandra and Castlereagh Weekly onto the site. Now I think I know more about the comings and goings at Eumungerie in the 1930s than the then-residents did. There have been many gems which I hope to write up in coming months but for now I heading back to that favourite topic of mine - wheat storage and transport.

This is the Eumungerie grain storage facility that I grew up with - SO41 bins and a bulkhead.


 Prior to the erection of the wheat bulkheads in 1968, bulk wheat was stored under a makeshift corrugated iron shed in those years when the harvest was greater than the capacity of the silo.  Here is a shot of the temporary shed from the south, taken in 1963.


Before there was bulk what, it was bagged wheat.  And lots of it. I don't know the year the following photo was taken, but I suspect it was early to mid-1930s. Taken from the silo itself, in the left foreground there is a slab of railway sleepers awaiting bagged wheat.


Every time I look at the previous photograph I find something new.  I have been mesmerised by the queue - with the collection of now vintage trucks and drays all waiting their turn to unload. Until now I hadn't notices the laconic pose of the gentleman sitting on the edge of the wheat stack.

It hasn't been all Trove treasures though. The humble Facebook has turned up the Eumungerie Community page. I never like to swipe other people's stuff off the internet, particularly without attribution but I cant find the owner of the following photo so describing how I cam upon it will have to do for fir dealing etc. Anyway, its a cracker!

It shows a half stacked wheat stack, taken from Eumungerie station. Just look at the way it was stacked, with the vertical walls facing the railway line.


Looking further north, two more stacks can been seen. These appear to be hay or wool stacks but are too indistinct to be identified properly. A gem of a photo!

So, for me its back to Trove and more digging!

Ciao for now,
Don.   



 

 


14 February 2015

A few memories of wheaties at Eumungerie

Given that I have written more about grain traffic on the Coonamble branch than any other human (how's that for a claim to fame?) I should really know 'stuff', but I don't. It falls to the generosity of time and spirit of others to improve my education, along with a couple of decent national institutions. I am going to drag a few of these influences together in this post.

First, a very straightforward explanation of peak season wheat train workings in the Eumungerie area provided by my father...

When the peak was on, a train of empties would arrive early and drop off the Eumungerie allocation on the silo track. These would be gravitated or barred to the chute and loaded. 

In the afternoon a loco (tender leading) and van would arrive from Dubbo and pick up the now loaded train and return it to Dubbo. The original would have continued on dropping off empties as allocated towards Gilgandra. 

As this area of land was marginal for wheat growing, there was extensive use of superphosphate.  This came from Newcastle or Port Kembla in tarped 'S' trucks. These were often added to the afternoon engine/van train and placed on the loading bank or near the crane.

Finally in the late afternoon the original loco would come back from Gilgandra and head to Dubbo with its loaded train.

Second, many will know of Col Hussey's most excellent blog Essence, worth reading both for the HO railway under construction and Col's explanation of real life operations on the NSWGR. Through the Aus_Model_Rail chat group Col recalled that during the large 1964/65 wheat harvest, trains that operated from Dubbo as far as Gilgandra were worked by bogie tendered 32 class as there was a triangle there to turn them there.  On specials that ran as far as Eumungerie they ran tender first out and engine first back. So, I think we have corroboration!

Finally, the benefit of having decently resourced national institutions? I refer in particular to the National Library of Australia's Trove website which contains 15,000 references to Eumungerie alone. It also has a series of photographs taken in December 1958 by a Mr J Tanner. I am reproducing several of the series below to illustrate the wheat loading process at Eumungerie.

First up, the morning train has been out and deposited a collection of BWH and RU hoppers on the silo road. One BWH has been loaded and a RU is in the process of being loaded.


Here is a close-up of the RU being loaded - great OHS!


Inside the road receival facilities farmers were either dumping bulk grain, or emptying bagged grain.
 

Emptying bagged grain would have been particularly lousy and hot work. Lucky this bloke is well dressed for it!


Finally, other farmers have a decent wait, especially if every bag needs to be emptied. Note the loaded BWH and directly behind it, a rare shot of the station officer's residence.



I strongly encourage everyone to log onto the Trove site - it is a national treasure.  I'll refrain from calling Col and my father national treasures, but they are very useful sources!

Ciao for now!
Don

24 November 2014

Not where I thought?

Here is a photograph of a fairly everyday experience from about 1965 (I think).

The loco in question - 3222 - was allocated to Dubbo in 1965 and 1966. It looks like the train it has behind it is a very healthy up pickup, with wool and wheat loading. 

The railway precinct is also rather interesting - the edge of the turntable can be seen, along with the water tank and carriage shed. Gillespie Bros. flour mill can be seen in the background, along with a relatively rare Metcalfe silo.



I had always had this photograph pegged as Gilgandra - principally due to the fact that the word 'Gil' was written on the slide mounting frame! Fairy reasonable conclusion to draw...

But now am not so sure. I am fairly sure the Metcalfe silo is out of town, and Gilgandra had a turning wye rather than a turntable (or maybe both?).

Wherever it is, its a cracker as a modelling proposition given most of the major infrastructure is on one side. Dead flat too.

The clue to where it is - and it may yet be Gil - may lie in the S trucks at the front of the train.  It appears that the second is part filled with some sort of uncovered aggregate or rock.

Enjoy the mystery!

09 August 2014

A grim future for Eumungerie's farmers

Graincorp have recently announced their 'Regeneration' project, which will result in the closure of tens of grain silos across NSW in a triumph of value stripping out of a former publicly-owned service.  Its a nice bit of 'regeneration', if you define regeneration as sawing off one of your legs in the hope that the lost weight will mean that you can run faster.

For the Coonamble line it will mean that Coonamble and Gilgandra are the two primary sites, with Gular as the third site.  Curban will be held for overflow in future years, while Armatree will remain open for overflow in 2014/15, then to move to 'non-operational' from 2015/16.

Eumungerie and Combara will be placed into 'non-operational' - in simpler words, closed. Last year's harvest was probably the last.


All may not be lost, yet. Graincorp will rent you a silo at Eumungerie, Combar or Armatree. All you need to do is download a form from their website.

Sigh...




04 August 2014

Village life in 2012

I am planning  bit of an assault on clearing some of the 'blog backlog' over the coming months.  One thing I thought would be timely is a bit of a look around the village of Eumungerie as it stands now.

These photos were taken around dusk on 12 January 2012.  No trains in this one, but there are few landmarks in Eumungerie that don't reek of railway.  First up, the railway yard...



Next, where all thirsty railway workers go - the pub. Currently known as the Drover's Dog.


And here is the village post office - or at least it was in 2012.  Hopefully it is still there...


This well-restored property's substantial out-building with chimney is a reminder that 40 odd years ago this was Pope's Bakery.



The local petrol station has seen better days, about 50 years ago.



And now for the Eumungerie-Coboco Hall.  Lucky it wasn't built at Coboco, as nothing exists at that location these days.

This rather substantial buildings was once the general store, and sold the best lollies in town.  The best of everything, actually.






Time to leave Eumungerie, with a shot of why it ever existed...






05 January 2014

Starting 2014 with a P

Happy New Year!

One of my resolutions this year is to finish off the 'great pre-war history' of grain transportation along the Coonamble branch line. This should enthuse the few readers of this blog as much as it does me!

In the meantime, just to keep faith with my loyal few readers here is 3230 on a down empty wheat at Eumungerie in September 1967.


22 November 2013

1931 - a golden harvest



The decade to 1931 had only produced two years where in excess of 600,000 bags of wheat had been harvested – and the last three harvests of the decade had struggled to achieve somewhere between 10 per cent and 20 per cent of that mark. 


This was all to change, with a boom harvest eventuating in the middle of the Great Depression.  It all came about in despite of the predictions, rather than in fulfillment of better days being ahead.



The opening of 1931 planting season brought gloomy tidings once more, thanks to the Sydney Morning Herald.  Under the heading, Wheat at Dubbo: Much Inferior Grain, the paper stated:


The recent rains have badly bleached the wheat, adding to the damage wrought by rust. Most farmers have harvested their best grain, and are now gathering the wheat which has been pinched by rust, which is mostly under f.a.q. (fair to average quality - ed). 


The rains will reduce the average acre yield, as some crops will not now be stripped which otherwise would have been harvested even if the grain was inferior. Feed is plentiful in spite of the grasshoppers. Seasonally the prospects are fair, but financially the prospects are not bright, as the returns will not pay the costs of production.


In the Dubbo silo 15,000 bushels of f.a.q. wheat were stored. It was then cleared and sent to the terminal elevators. The silo is now being filled with non-milling wheat, weighing from 59lb down to 56lb to the bushel.


District mills are not operating on the market, but are waiting the decision of the Federal Government and the Commonwealth Bank. No public effort is made to store inferior wheat, some being stored on farms for stock feed when dry conditions return. Unless some financial assistance is given much Inferior wheat will not be stripped. Growers are appealing for assistance by way of a guarantee.


The district silos show much greater returns than Dubbo itself. Eumungerie has received over 150,000 bushels, Gilgandra fully 200,000, and Talbragar over 60,000. It is estimated that the Dubbo police patrol district will yield over 37,000 bushels.


By late September 1931the Sydney Morning Herald was reporting an improved situation, though the wheat producing areas along the Coonamble line were lagging other western areas around Parkes. The newspaper’s reports from the relevant senior agricultural inspectors showed the difference:


In a report on crop conditions in that portion of the western district of which Parkes is the centre, Mr. Harold Bartlett, senior agricultural inspector, mentions that very opportune rains were registered last Saturday, and although the falls were somewhat light, varying from 40 to 85 points, the steady, calm conditions before and after the disturbance gave every point its full crop value.  The early sown and forward crops have every prospect of satisfactory grain development, but the later sown paddocks, of which the area is not great, require easy conditions until further rain...


In the opinion of Mr. B M Arthur, the senior agricultural inspector for the Dubbo district, the average yield there will probably not exceed 10 to 12 bushels per acre, and as the area under wheat does not exceed 50 per cent, of last season's total, the yield of grain for this portion of the western district will not be large in the aggregate.


September again proved comparatively dry and a good soaking rain of about an inch would have been extremely beneficial during the month. Only two light falls, ranging from 20 to 60 points, were registered on the 9th and 26th instant respectively over most of the district.



The first rainfall was of a cyclonic nature and was accompanied by hail in several localities. In the Gilgandra district a large amount of damage was reported through a strip of country several miles wide, where terrific hail and wind chopped many farmers' crops to pieces and absolutely ruined the season's prospects. The actual extent of the damage is not known at present; however, damage was done round Eumungerie, Curban, and other localities.



These small falls, though useful, have not been sufficient for the general requirements of the cropped area. Wheat planted after the cessation of the winter rains has not made much growth, and is not now likely to return a payable yield, as the required timely assistance has been too long delayed. Many crops are now well out in ear and some of the early-sown areas were seriously damaged by frosts. Others seen are filling their grain well, look healthy, and promise fair to good yields.



Within the month stem rust has been, noticed in some crops of susceptible varieties, mainly on the flag. Flag smut is also fairly prevalent in susceptible varieties, but as a large area of Nabawa has been sown losses due to this disease may not be severe.


Fallowing has been continued during the month in every direction, and Mr. Arthur considers that the total area now ploughed exceeds any previously carried out in the district.


Good October weather and rains brought the crop forward very nicely.  It meant that with greater optimism the Herald could report on 10 November 1931 that ‘six new silos (are) to be opened’ as part of the move to bulk handling of wheat.  Along with this move came a plethora of stern admonishments to growers, faithfully reproduced by the newspaper, about gaming the system.


Arrangements have now been completed in regard to the opening of the wheat silos during the coming harvest the wheat commissioner and manager of the grain elevators (Mr Harris) said yesterday that old season's wheat still remained in two of the country elevators, but the wheat in them had all been purchased by millers and delivery would be completed within the next few days. The balance of the 1930-31 wheat was carried in the terminal elevator.


The first elevators to be opened were at Curban and Gilgandra, which commenced receiving wheat yesterday, followed next Monday by Eumungerie.


Mr Harris advises farmers not to rush harvesting operations as green wheat will not be received into the elevators, and therefore no advantage will be gained by harvesting the wheat too early. Wheat should also be delivered in a clean condition in order that the standard of export wheat may be maintained


Growers are particularly warned against attempting to mix any old wheat with their deliveries of new wheat, as this will only necessitate the rejection of the whole parcel On no account will old wheat be accepted into the silos amongst new wheat, on account of its tendency to weevil thus endangering the safety of the whole contents of the bin.


Furthermore, under the Wheat Bounty Act growers will be called upon to lodge claims for the Commonwealth bounty of 4½ per bushel on this season's wheat, and any attempt to include old grain will make the claimant liable to a heavy fine.


Growers should also note that under the Federal Bounty Act it is only to the elevators that delivery of wheat can be made in the grower's own name, either for sale, or for storage pending sale, without the employment of an agent in all other cases, delivery has to be made to a flour miller, wheat merchant, or co-operative organisation.


Mr Harris added that an extraordinary demand had been made for bulk trucks for loading at non-silo stations.  Applications for these trucks should be made to the nearest Stationmaster, stating the date trucks were required for. 



Appearances pointed to a larger percentage of wheat being delivered in bulk this season than in any previous year.


At the start of the 1932 year the harvest was in full swing and the shortcomings of government and the railways were in full view of farmers and newspapermen.  On 6 January 1932 the Sydney Morning Herald reported under the byline of ‘Congestion at the Silos’ that there had been a huge increase in deliveries.  The size of the harvest was such that the Minister for Agriculture showed little collegiate sympathy for his ministerial colleague, the Minister for Railways, and his department generally.


The Minister for Agriculture stated yesterday that he was somewhat concerned at some very incorrect and misleading statements which had recently been made in regard to the wheat silos.


One allegation to the effect that when all the silos were filled farmers were advised by the Department of Agriculture to make bulk deliveries to sidings where there are no silos was absolutely incorrect. On the face of it, it was not only untrue but foolish.  It should have been evident that if the department was unable to remove wheat from the silo stations it would be equally unable to remove it from the non silo stations.


Mr Dunn declared that it was the function of the Railway Department to provide sufficient suitable trucks for the removal of the harvest.  It had been stated that the Department of Agriculture had refused to pay £3 each for the conversion of ordinary trucks into bulk wheat trucks.  This was quite correct and he was astonished at such a request being made by the railways.  His own department had no funds available to spend on railway rolling stock nor was it the function, of his department to make such provision.  That was the duty of the railways which must stand up to their responsibilities.


The Department of Agriculture received only a penny a bushel for wheat delivered from non silo stations and could therefore, hardly afford to pay £3 per truck- holding about 600 bushels when such converted truck might only make one trip during the remainder of the season.



So, the Department of Railways once again was being held responsible for the lack of foresight, at a time when no-one else had shown similar talents either – and certainly not senior members of the Department of Agriculture!


Moving to make it abundantly clear that the move to bulk wheat handling was not the cause of the delays at silos, Minister Dunn proceeded to declare that the farmers’ take-up of bulk wheat handling was the issue.


The Minister declared that the silo system, had shown wonderful results in efficient working during the extraordinary demand made upon it during the last few weeks. 


Two years ago the department was appealing to farmers to handle their wheat in bulk and at many stations where there were silos only about 50 per cent of the deliveries were made to them this year without any notification to the department of their change of intention wheat growers not only at the silo stations but at other stations were carting all their wheat to the silos and were expecting the system to receive an indefinite quantity of grain without the slightest congestion.



Minister Dunn had a fair point.  He noted that prior to the current harvest the second heaviest harvest on record was 13 322 000 bushels.  By 31 December 1931 the Government’s silos received 19 754 000 bushels - 50 per cent more than previous.  Interestingly, he noted that Eumungerie had recorded one of the largest increases – to 267,000 bushels.


Minister Dunn also reasonably observed that the receiving capacity of the country silos was governed by the ability of the Railway Department to remove the surplus wheat.  To conclude the expansive interview, Minister Dunn added that a statement that wheat rotting at silos was absolutely untruthful and was likely to ‘injure the reputation of this country abroad’!


Minister Dunn was proven correct, ultimately.  At nearly 602,000 bags, the 1931/32 harvest was the third largest on record for the Coonamble region.  Yes, the wheat entered a world market where prices were depressed and unlikely to provide a great return.  But the harvest showed the capacity of the area to produce quality harvests after a number of lean years.


Eumungerie itself provided nearly one-third of the volume, with 185,600 bags of wheat (or equivalent volumes of bulk wheat) being dispatched. Notably for the first time in a number of years the north of the line – Curban, Armatree, Gular and Coonamble itself – produced another third of the line’s harvest, so it was no longer just a Eumungerie/Gilgandra effort.

03 August 2013

Oops!

It has been too long. Rather than load you loyal readers with tales of the 1937 wheat harvest, of which there are many, I thought it would be better to mark a return to blogging with a quick photographic tribute to the day in Eumungerie that someone wasn't paying attention.

These photos are, I think, from the mid 1990s. They speak for themselves, so I won't. Pretty sure no one or nothing was injured, except for pride. 

An average day at the silo, shunting the wagons into position with a tractor.


Ok, fill her up! Just about there, woah!


D'oh!


And now that they had fed the galahs, it was time to make a getaway on the tractor...


Will try to return with the serious stuff later!


25 December 2012

The 1930 wheat harvest

I last posted on the topic of wheat growing and transportation in the Eumungerie area many months ago - and I had left the story at the end of 1929, at a very low ebb.

What then took Eumungerians and NSW politicians from the despair of late 1929 to a decision which would result in the tripling of the size of bulk grain facilities by 1933?


Certainly it was partially faith in the long term future of the district.  And then there was the need, at least recognised by Jack Lang’s NSW Labor Government when it was in power during this dire time of the need to provide rural people with worthwhile employment opportunities through public works (such as constructing silos) in the midst of the greatest economic and social dislocation of the 20th century. 



Ultimately it was the track record of the farmers of the location - the pluck reported in 1922 in the ‘Eumungerie will come again’ attitude of people like Farmer Buck, of “Rocky Bend” at Eumungerie did indeed prove that total crop failures at Eumungerie are few.



Once more, starting with the 1930/31 harvest, Eumungerie became the wheat-producing powerhouse of the Dubbo district, with highly skilled farmers tilling good cropping lands in an indomitable spirit.  There was great hope for this harvest, which was not matched by early reports.  In April 1930 the Sydney Morning Herald reported that the seemingly ubiquitous:



… Mr. B. M. Arthur… states that during March thunderstorms of a patchy nature - in some parts rather severe in character - fell over practically the whole of his district, although some centres, particularly around Dubbo, missed nearly all of them… Some centres, such as Gulargambone, Armatree, and Eumungerie, had up to four inches.



Preparations for wheat cropping are still being actively carried out, and there is no doubt. Mr. Arthur considers, that with reasonably suitable conditions prevailing during the next three months a record area will be placed under crop.



One month later the same newspaper noted that:



As elsewhere in much of the wheat belt, the rainfall in the northern half of the western district (of which Dubbo is the centre) was much below requirements during April it was, however, sufficient in many cases to ensure a satisfactory germination, and also to connect up with the moisture stored in well-prepared fallows.



On the other hand, it also created tricky conditions where the moisture was patchy, thereby preventing either a dry sowing or one in a uniformly moist soil.  In some cases it caused a certain amount of malting in the grain.



Patchy thunderstorms early in the month benefited isolated localities, more particularly north of Dubbo, around Eumungerie, Gilgandra, Armatree, Dunedoo, and Coolah enabling sowing to be continued safely.  A general rain aggregating from 30 points to over an inch was received on April 24, and this was of incalculable benefit. A further half to one inch is required to make the position safe for all wheatgrowers.



A large area has already been sown, and farmers are steadily pursuing their way towards a record area objective, both individually and collectively. All, the local instructor (Mr B M Arthur) states, are optimistic that good results will be achieved.



Slowly this optimism evaporated, wilting under the enduring effects of a multi-year drought.  By October 1930 the Sydney Morning Herald recorded that


“Many crops, more particularly in the more western areas of this district, such as Trangie, Tomingley, Narromine, Collie, Eumungerie, and to a less extent Dubbo and other eastern areas, are severely feeling the effect of the prolonged dry conditions. They are wilting badly, and in some cases burning off rapidly."


In this way, Mr. B. M. Arthur, the senior agricultural instructor for the Dubbo district summarises the position at the end of September.


He declared that it was also having the effect of forcing all late-sown areas, and also crops on light soils to spindle and tend to run up to ear without stooling.


"The position is not yet by any means serious," Mr. Arthur continues, "but every additional dry day is giving many of the crops a further setback, and the record acre yields which seemed probable last month are rapidly disappearing. However, a useful rain of half an inch or more in the near future would go a long way towards rectifying the present position."


September was notable for the absence of rains of a useful nature (except in isolated places), and for frosts on several occasions, particularly late in the month, on 24, 25, and 26, and several windy days. These conditions altered the outlook, and instead of complaining of too much rain and an absence of hardening frosts, which was the position in August, growers are now hoping for early serviceable rains. They are also wondering what effect the recent frosts will have on the many forward overgrown, sappy crops now out in ear.


Some signs of stem rust have been seen in the Gilgandra and Narromine districts. Flag rust is to be seen in many crops, in some very badly. Powdery mildew has practically disappeared. Flag smut will, it is believed, take its usual toll, and has been seen on frequent occasions, but should not be more severe than in other years.

The report of rust at the start of October was replaced with worse news a fortnight later.  The same newspaper reported:   

In a report to the Department of Agriculture, the District Agricultural Instructor for the Dubbo district (Mr. B. M. Arthur) stated several days ago that following up rumours received in regard to rust in the crops he had investigated a number of paddocks at Eumungerie, Balladoran, Gilgandra, and Armatree, and had found stem rust to be very bad in some crops.


Nearly all the commonly sown commercial varieties had been affected, the only one that was fairly free and showing resistance was Nabawa…



A later report, written last Friday, and received by the department yesterday, states that Mr. Arthur was very perturbed about the amount and development of rust in the crops in the neighbourhood of Dubbo, particularly to the west and north, including Terramungamine, Rawsonville, Coboco, Eumungerie, and Balladoran.



He was not in a position to state definitely what would be the actual damage, but was inclined to think that it would be considerable and would extend over a wide area of the district before it finished.



Despite the existence of the rust blight, the newspaper could also report that the Government Statistician had issued an estimate based upon reports received from wheat growers throughout the State. 



The Statistician noted that the total area sown of 5,618,800 acres was 30 per cent greater than the previous harvest, and was a record in acreage sown.  This acreage was shared across a record 17,658 land holdings. 



Included in these numbers was Eumungerie’s offering of 106 holdings of 45,655 acres under wheat production and 3,854 hay-producing acres.  Eumungerie was the third largest district in the region.   In second place, Dubbo, there were 216 holdings cultivating 59,756 acres for wheat and 5,452 acres for hay.  The largest district surrounded Gilgandra, where a mere 166 holdings were responsible for 65, 382 acres of wheat production and 7,098 acres of hay making.



On 5 November 1930 grain elevators at Curban and Gilgandra opened for the season, receiving the first of the State’s harvest. A fortnight later the silo at Eumungerie opened to receive the bounty. 



When making the announcement of the silo opening, the commissioner indicated that about 20,000,000 bushels were expected to be received at the State's silos during the season.  Of this 8,000,000 to 12,000,000 bushels were to be used by local millers, with the remainder exported as bulk wheat.



By the end of the harvest, farmers along the Coonamble branch had accrued 600,000 bags of wheat – five times the year previous.  At 181,000 bags, Eumungerie had contributed nearly one third of the total. Years of drought, pestilence and disease had been endured and overcome.